WineBoard
MI anti-shipping bill passed (@#$^%*!!!!) - Printable Version

+- WineBoard (https://www.wines.com/wineboard)
+-- Forum: RESOURCES AND OTHER STUFF (https://www.wines.com/wineboard/forum-300.html)
+--- Forum: Wine and Politics (https://www.wines.com/wineboard/forum-7.html)
+--- Thread: MI anti-shipping bill passed (@#$^%*!!!!) (/thread-2920.html)



- anna - 06-09-2000

No news updates yet -- I just called my state senator's office. The anti-shipping bill passed by a large margin (33 yeas, 4 nays, one excused) after a debate that went until 10:30 last night.

I'm not sure whether this bill has already gone to the state House or not, but things don't look good. I'm just hoping that our governor is a free trade advocate and will veto the bill if it gets past both the House and the Senate. At least there's still that lawsuit in MI too, as a back up!

[This message has been edited by anna (edited 06-09-2000).]


- Fedup - 06-13-2000

Anna -
The MI bill, H4752 (S-1), needs to go back to the House for concurrence since there were significant changes made by the Senate. This did not happen before the midnight deadline on the 8th. There will be a "clean up" session on June 20th. In the meantime Free the Grapes! has asked our MI members to contact the bill's sponsor Nancy Cassis. Cassis original intent was to prevent minors from purchasing wine on the Internet, but of course now the bill does much more than that. Any MI residents who want more information on contacting Cassis can e-mail us at fedup@freethegrapes.org
Seana
Free the Grapes!


- Thomas - 06-13-2000

The "beauty" of our so-called democratic legislative system is that a bill intended for one purpose rarely stays on focus and often is used by others to address a distinctly separate purpose. In other words, to corrupt the bill.

As I get older I question the system of attaching to and amending bills intended for legislation.


- mrdutton - 06-13-2000

That, Foodie, is one reason why I support the line item veto for the President. But that will not happen without an ammendment to the Constitution.


- Thomas - 06-14-2000

Here's an idea. Give the president not just a line item veto but a line PERSON veto. That way, he can veto the likes of Thurmond, Hatch and all other usurpers of our individual right to make our own decisions, provided of course that the president is not in their camp.


- Kcwhippet - 06-19-2000

Here's some additional sata - www.winetoday.com/story/0001616.html.