+- WineBoard (https://www.wines.com/wineboard)
+-- Forum: GENERAL (https://www.wines.com/wineboard/forum-100.html)
+--- Forum: Rants & Raves (https://www.wines.com/wineboard/forum-12.html)
+--- Thread: For Foodie and others of a philosophical bent: what the REALLY smart guys are saying (/thread-13062.html)
- Botafogo - 12-03-2003
This is almost beyond belief:
http://enemyvessel.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=2115&FORUM_ID=4&CAT_ID=1&Topic_Title=The+Big+Broadcast%2E%2E%2E&Forum_Title=We+all+have+issues
- Kcwhippet - 12-03-2003
Some people have way too much spare time.
- Botafogo - 12-03-2003
Moderators, do you have any magic ways to shrink that URL down to a smaller hyperlink that is titled something like "Parker Kant Taste"?
- ShortWiner - 12-03-2003
Well, you gotta enjoy the statement that it is "epistemologically impossible and gnoseolocially groundless to point wines." Whatever gnoseolocially means, I agree!
- Auburnwine - 12-03-2003
You know it's funny. Just last evening the missus was asking me: "Do universals really exist and what is their nature? Are they reducible to set theoretical constructs over a domain of particulars, albeit perhaps merely possible particulars?"
Naturally, I says to her (always the safest answer): "Yes, dear." Yep, we got many a wry titter out of that one.
And to the woefully uninformed, "gnoseolocially" is a wine-tasting term that means sniffing wine with friends. It's just that that fellow can't spell -- he means "nosey, oh socially".
- Thomas - 12-03-2003
What a read: zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
- Bucko - 12-03-2003
It speaks volumes about anyone who would go to "Wine Therapy." Yikes!!
- winoweenie - 12-04-2003
Enny_bodies care to join me starting Tuesday in "Gnossisociaapathic 101 wine-snorting?" WW
- hotwine - 12-04-2003
That kind of discourse was fun in my philosopy courses 40 years ago. Now, I think "What a bunch of crap!"