Archive for Blog

Critics take notice of Zinfandel’s “coming of age”

Critics take notice of Zinfandel’s “coming of age”

Up until only recently, according to wine journalist Rod Byers CWE, Zinfandel has been presented as “the Oakland Raiders of wine… loud, proud, unruly, and unapologetic.”

But at this past January’s ZAP (Zinfandel Advocates & Producers) Grand Tasting, Byers noticed an increased “sophistication” in the Zinfandels. In a report entitled Zinfandel grape comes of age, published this past March 6 in The Union, the Grass Valley (Western Nevada County) daily newspaper, Byers wrote: “None (of the Zinfandels at this year’s ZAP) seemed overly alcoholic, sweet, or rough. Only one could have been considered moderately tannic. The wines were fruity, balanced, and even elegant.”

Which is cool, since this confirms our own observations. Mr. Byers, a Certified Wine Educator who also teaches at Sierra College, has been moderating day-long winemaker seminars at ZAP’s Grand Tasting in San Francisco every year for the past few years. This has put him in a great position to assess the evolution of California’s Zinfandels over the past 22 years.

Zinfandel ZAP was started up in 1991, says Byers, when “a small band of winemakers were growing increasingly concerned that Zinfandel was in danger of disappearing. Zinfandel, the backbone of the California wine industry for over a century, was falling out of favor with the wine drinking public. Faced with dropping sales growers were yanking out vineyards or budding over to other varieties. Much of what was left was being produced as white-zin. In fact, new wine consumers sometimes thought Zinfandel was a white grape.”

The issue with White Zinfandel, as Lodi’s grape growers were also discovering, was that demand for grapes to produce this pink toned, fruity style of wine was also beginning to drop precipitously. When grape contracts began to disappear, it was sink-or-swim time for all the growers, big and small – some from families who have been farming in Lodi for over 50 years, some for well over 100 years.

So many of them did what you do when it’s time to make lemonade out of lemons: they applied for winery bonds and began producing their own wines. Klinker Brick, Heritage Oak, Harney Lane, LangeTwins Family, Van Ruiten Family, Mettler Family, and Peirano Estate are just some of the outstanding Lodi wineries that have risen out of those circumstances over the past 20 years.

ZAP, in the meantime, began to attract up to 10,000 Zinfandel enthusiasts at a time to its annual Grand Tasting. Stylistically, according to Byers, many of these Zinfandels followed the style of ZAP co-founder Joel Peterson of Sonoma’s Ravenswood Winery, whose motto was “No Wimpy Wines.” More and more Zinfandels were deliberately scaled to be “brash and irreverent” – very popular among consumers, but less so among more and more critics complaining “that Zinfandel was too tannic, too fruity, too alcoholic, too out of balance, and not food-friendly.”

Just three years ago, for instance, the popular wine columnist Steve Heimoff confessed (in Talkin’ Zinfandel blues), “I haven’t gone (to a ZAP) for years,” while decrying the “fat, extracted, high-alcohol sweet style… clumsy, inelegant, and undrinkable with almost anything, except for that all-purpose food group, ‘barbecue’” – ouch…

“The bombastic, frat-party-gone-wild image might have been useful for establishing an identity for Zinfandel,” comments Byers, “but now winemakers like Peterson prefer to talk about balance, elegance, restraint, and food compatibility.”

Another major development signaling the maturity of Zinfandel, says Byers, was the 2013 ZAP’s inclusion of “a Terroir Tasting Area to compare and contrast flavor profiles between different Zinfandel growing regions like Dry Creek, the Sierra Foothills, or Lodi.” In a ZAP Flights seminar, taking place the day before the Grand Tasting, the Historic Vineyard Society – dedicated to the preservation of heritage vineyards throughout the state – put on a terroir-focused tasting of three of California’s major Zinfandel regions (including Lodi, presented by Turley Wine Cellars’ Tegan Passalacqua).

McCay, 2012 Zinfandel harvest (Truluck's Vineyard)With increased sophistication of Zinfandel lovers comes increased appreciation of the specific vineyards from where the finest Zinfandels are sourced. Says Byers, “Perhaps the two wines that impressed me the most were the McCay Cellars Truluck’s Vineyard Zinfandel from Lodi and the Andis Winery Estate Zinfandel from Amador. Both of those wines broke the mold of their regions. While words like rustic and tannic are often attached to the wines of the Sierra Foothills, and raisined and ripe to those of Lodi, both these wines were fruity, stylish, flavorful, and balanced.”

McCay, of course, is not the only Lodi winery evolving in this fashion. LangeTwins, Peirano, Heritage Oak, and The Lucas Winery, to name just four, have been focused on this balanced, un-Oakland Raider-like style pretty much from the get-go. Although vintage conditions had some something to do with it, even Zinfandels like Macchia’s recently released 2011 single-vineyard bottlings, and Michael David’s 2010 Earthquake, indicate subtle movements towards the balanced style.

One could argue, of course, that Zinfandel came “of age” a long time ago – when wine lovers first began to embrace it wholeheartedly as one of the great varietals of the wine world. But as wine lovers’ appreciation of nuances –especially those related to individual vineyard distinctions – have begun to grow, so has the appreciation of heritage vineyards. This may not keep each and every ancient planting, declining in production, from being pulled out for real and practical reasons. But if anything is going to save them, it’s going to be consumer demand: the willingness to pay more for Zinfandels from vineyards that cost more to maintain.

On the aesthetic side, no longer do Zinfandels need to be “big,” or the opposite of “wimpy,” to be noticed. They just need to be true to their place of origin; or perhaps better, always go great with barbecue!

The featured blog article was first published online at lodiwine.com and is republished here with the permission of ZAP ( Zinfandel Advocates & Producers) and the author, Randy Caparoso, a long time friend of this web site, Wines.com.


Author, Randy Caparoso

Randy Caparoso

Randy Caparoso is a multi-award winning sommelier and restaurateur, founding partner, Roy’s Restaurants and longtime wine journalist, including Sommelier Journal, The Tasting Panel Magazine, San Joaquin Magazine and lodiwine.com. Randy covers the entire West Coast from his home base in the middle of a 50-year old Lodi Zinfandel vineyard.

Caparoso in the recipient of many industry awards, including recognition by the Academy of Wine Communications for Excellence in Wine Writing and Encouragement of Higher Industry Standards, and he is an Electoral College Member for the Vintners Hall of Fame at the Culinary Institute of America, Greystone.

Randy’s blog, Culinary Wine & Food Adventures is one of our favorites. He writes about wine strictly from the perspective of food. To him, wine is a food like a rose is a rose, and his words bring clarity to this concept in new, delicious ways.

Posted in: Blog

Leave a Comment (0) →

Welcome to the new Wines.com

Welcome to the new Wines.com

Welcome!  Our new look is finally here! For the last few months, we’ve been very busy remodeling and changing the vision, direction and look of this portal. It’s been awhile coming and I extend my apologies for the inconvenience, staleness and dust you may have seen lately. We hope you enjoy the NEW Wines.com.

A new expanded wine store is coming soon, so you’ll be able to find your favorite wines and discover exciting new wines as well.

In the coming weeks and months, we’re planning to add many interesting new features.  Wines.com’s mission is once again what it was when this site was originally conceived, namely to bring inspiration, new ideas and enjoyment to everyone interested in wine.

While wine has become more popular over the last ten years, it can still be an intimidating and confusing subject. At wines.com we working to change that!  And we’re not just talking about making wine more accessible and fun, we’re just doing it.

Please join us and add your voice to the conversation. Whether you are a wine expert,  experienced collector, a casual wine drinker, or a total newcomer to the huge world of wine, Wines.com hopes to offer you fresh inspiration to enhance your enjoyment of the endless variations of the fruit of the vine.

I’m very interested in what you think of the new look and organization. Please add your comments below, if you have a minute. Thank you for joining us. 

Cheers!
Jackie Wilferd
Founder & President
Wines.com

Posted in: Blog

Leave a Comment (0) →

Did Robert Parker Just Fumble On The Goal Line? (The Wine Advocate Possibly Sold To Investors In Singapore)

While we can usually count on the wine world for providing news that can best be classified as odd-but-quickly-forgettable (Exhibit A: anybody remember the wine snob ghost??), the recent coverage of changes coming to Robert Parker’s The Wine Advocate reads like an elaborate April Fool’s (except it’s coming in December, 2012).

According to The Wall Street Journal, uber-critic Parker – who has quite recently vehemently and publicly stated his desire not to retire – is in the process of selling his wine newsletter to a group of investors in Singapore.

Felix Salmon has an interesting and well-written take on the news, and he sums up the collective “what the hell?!??” reaction of the fine wine world to the possibility of TWA moving in a direction that seems the polar opposite of what most wine insiders believed would be the future of TWA (and that includes insiders I know personally, who have direct access to Parker – so include me firmly in the “what the hell?!??” camp).

It’s long been believed that Robert Parker, whenever he decided to retire, would hand-off TWA as-is (given that he grew it literally from nothing using his own impressive hustle), grooming heir apparent Antonio Galloni to eventually take control of TWA (and speculated that Galloni, once given the full reigns, might shake up the editorial staff).

But the news coming from the WSJ suggests a very different path for TWA than what was brewing in the collective fine wine hive mind. Here are some of the highlights, as reported by Salmon:

  • TWA will be sold to a group of Singapore-based investors (described by Parker as “visionaries”), who according to Salmon have “no experience either in wine or in publishing”
  • Parker will retain the title of Chairman, but will be turning over editorial control not to Galloni, but to TWA’s Singapore-based correspondent, Master of Wine Lisa Perrotti-Brown
  • The print version of TWA newsletter will be retired (despite the fact that it’s profitable), and [see comments - RMP has corrected this via his twitter feed] there will be a specific Southeast Asian edition added, “aimed at corporate clients like airlines and luxury hotels”
  • A new China-based corespondent will be hired, specifically to report on the nascent industry of wines produced in Asia
  • Advertising – long shunned by Parker and often used by him as criticism against the intentions of other wine review publications – will be accepted at the electronic edition of TWA.

“What the hell?!??”

While one could certainly forgive Parker for wanting to bow out of the game (especially given the recent negative press levied against former TWA critic Jay Miller), this move to sell TWA doesn’t really pass the surface-level glance common-sense test when compared to how staunchly Parker publicized, adhered to, and defended the aspects and policies he felt made TWA stand apart from other critical wine publications.

Certainly no one is losing a ton betting on the wine frenzy happening in Asia right now, but other than financially the move just doesn’t seem to add up. Salmon sums it up best, I think, when he states that “none of this seems like the action of a man who wants to preserve his legacy” – certainly it doesn’t seem like the kind of consistent move you’d have expected from the man, particularly after his recent induction into the Vintners Hall of Fame in Napa, at a time when his favorable legacy in the wine world seemed all but a lock.

“What the hell?!??”

Will this move tarnish the legacy? Has Parker fumbled the ball at the goal line?

Assuming the deal actually goes through, then only time will tell…

Cheers!

Posted in: Blog

Leave a Comment (9) →

Wine Revolutionaries Call America Home

By David White

napoleonOne of the hottest winemakers in France is Jerome Bressy, the proprietor of Domaine Gourt de Mautens the Southern Rhone village of Rasteau.

Over the past decade, he’s developed quite a reputation. American wine critic Robert Parker has called his winery “sensational,” and France’s two leading wine commentators, Michel Bettane and Thierry Desseauve, have said Bressy deserves recognition as one of the Rhone’s great winemakers. This past year, Bettane and Desseauve honored Bressy for producing both the “Best White” and the “Best Rosé” in the Southern Rhone.

But next year, thanks to a recent decision by French regulators, Bressy may find it difficult to market his wines.

The reason? In France, strict laws dictate winegrowing and winemaking — and Bressy violated the rules. Even though the basis for many of these rules make sense, Bressy’s tale helps explain why adventurous winemakers feel more welcome in America.

French wine laws trace back to 1935. At the time, globalization threatened the dominance of French wines, so lawmakers created a system to guarantee both quality and geographic typicity. Some laws codified tradition — like what grapes could be grown where — and others detailed total minutiae, like vine density.

Because of these laws, consumers know what to expect from French wine. Red Burgundy is Pinot Noir; white Burgundy is Chardonnay; Sancerre is Sauvignon Blanc; and so on.

Jerome Bressy’s “offense” is hardly offensive.

A student of history, Bressy has spent the last few years reintroducing traditional grapes to his vineyard. So today, about 23 percent of Bressy’s estate is planted with obscure grapes like Vaccarese, Counoise, Muscardin, which are interspersed with the more common Grenache, Mourvedre, and Syrah. By French law, these minor varieties can only comprise only 15 percent of a red wine labeled from Rasteau.

So to label his wines as the market expects, Bressy has no choice but to rip up some of his vines or alter his blend. This despite the fact that his bottlings are historically accurate — and that France’s wine laws were designed, in part, to codify tradition.

At worst, Bressy seems guilty of “creative eccentricity.” That’s how VinConnect, a U.S. company that enables consumers to order wines directly from Gourt de Mautens, has described the winemaker. But he’s hardly a revolutionary — Bressy’s transgression is rooted in respect for his vineyard and its history.

It’s no wonder why wine writer Alder Yarrow once criticized French regulators for being “ignorant, stubborn, and backwards.”

Needless to say, true revolutionaries find it difficult to make wine in France. They turn to the new world, where experimentation and innovation is embraced.

Consider Syrah. Today, some of California’s most exciting Syrah comes from incredibly cool climates historically associated with Pinot Noir. Producers like Wind Gap and Arnot-Roberts, both based in Sonoma County, craft stunning Syrah from vineyards where grapes struggle to ripen.

If a winemaker in France wanted to experiment with Syrah in the cool climate of Burgundy, it’d be nearly impossible to sell his wines, as it’d be illegal to note where the grapes originated.

In the United States, winemakers aren’t limited by such strict laws. Indeed, the teams at Wind Gap and Arnot-Roberts are constantly on the lookout for esoteric grapes with potential in California’s vast and varied climate. Arnot-Roberts, for example, crafts a delicious rosé from Touriga Nacional, a Portuguese variety. Wind Gap makes a highly regarded white using Trousseau Gris, a variety that’s even rare in its ancestral home of eastern France.

Elsewhere in Sonoma, 31-year-old Morgan Twain-Peterson of Bedrock Wine Company is making distinctly American wines that would make Jerome Bressy smile. Twain-Peterson is best known for using some of California’s oldest vines to make traditional California field blends.

In Napa Valley, a group of renegade winemakers is eschewing Cabernet Sauvignon in favor of intensely floral, crisp whites inspired by the wines of northeastern Italy. One label worth finding is Massican, whose owner, Dan Petroski, studied winemaking in Sicily. Another is Arbe Garbe, owned by an Italian named Enrico Bertoz who moved to California in 1998.

Across the United States, examples like these abound. The wine world benefits tremendously from these vintners — those who innovate new wines and preserve something special. In many ways, America is home to more winemakers like Jerome Bressy than France. That’s worth celebrating.

David White, a wine writer, is the founder and editor of Terroirist.com. His columns are housed at Wines.com, the fastest growing wine portal on the Internet.

Posted in: Blog

Leave a Comment (0) →

“Think Robert Parker Doesn’t Deserve To Be In The Vintners Hall of Fame? Wrong, Jack!”

Written by Joe Roberts CSW, 2012 Wine Blog Award Finalist
Find him on Twitter @1winedude

The Culinary Institute of America recently announced its 2013 list of inductees for the Vintners Hall of Fame. Each year, a list of potential inductees is proposed and then voted on by a group of representatives within the wine media, who seek to induct “the men and women who have been responsible for the growth and world-wide prestige of the California wine industry.”

The 2013 list includes three fairly non-controversial names – farmworking pioneer Cesar Chavez, vintner Meredith “Merry” Edwards, and wine writer Frank Schoonmaker – along with one much more controversial name, one that will be stealing the spotlight, and will probably make the inductees and/or their families feel a bit like that dark-haired guy in the Dukes of Hazard (what was his name, again?): critic Robert M. Parker, Jr. <!– more –>

At this point in the world of wine, Parker is controversial no matter what the context, even despite the fact that he’s been pulling back on his wine review duties in The Wine Advocate and seems to be progressively handing over the reigns of the magazine to heir apparent staffer Antonio Galloni. It takes only a passing glance into one of his latest forays into the public eye to understand why; in a recent interview with Sommelier Journal, Parker dropped the gloves and used the Natural Wine movement as a punching bag.

And don’t get wine geeks started on the merits and pitfalls of rating wines with the 100 point system that was popularized by Parker – that one might get you into an actual fistfight depending on who you’re talking to…

Even if you loathe the 100 point scale, RMP deserves a place in the Vintners Hall of Fame as sure as anyone else who has their bust and names emblazoned in bronze in the Culinary Institute of America’s Barrel Room in St. Helena. Here are two reasons why.

Wine quality worldwide is higher than it’s ever been, due in no small part to the influence of Robert Parker.

There are a ton of good, affordable, clean, well-made wines available to consumers right now, and not just from California, either. Parker played a significant part in making that happen. How? He put wine producers to task. He ignored pedigree, history, and price, and decided to talk about exactly what was in the bottle – good or bad.

And people who rail against RMP and his 100 point rating scale now tend to forget that a ton of bad wine used to be made. Once he gained traction with retailers, distributors and collectors, Parker put those producers to task, and word was out on the street of the wine world: crappy wines were going to get called out.

The flip-side of this is that wines started to get made simply to please Parker’s palate, and that might have been partially responsible for a lot of the sameness and lack of character seen in a lot of wines at moderate price points these days. But blaming Parker for that is sort of like blaming George Lucas for all of the crappy, effects-laden sci-fi films that have been released since Star Wars. It’s not really his fault, people, and the good in this case far outweighs the bad (boring wine is going to get made anyway – at least now it has a minimum quality standard!).

Parker set the wine critic work ethic standard.

Did anyone work harder than Parker did when launching The Wine Advocate? It’s doubtful – in his heyday, the man’s stamina for packing in the stops and the amount of wines tasted at each when touring California (and other regions) is now legendary (for more detail on that, check out the excellent book The Emperor of Wine). That work ethic is now also deeply imbued within The Wine Advocate staffers, and is the standard against which all other wine critic work (and critical work in other fields, for that matter) is to be judged.

So don’t miss the forest for the trees, people – Parker earned that CIA bronze bas relief with blood, sweat, and a lot of swirling and spitting.

Posted in: Blog

Leave a Comment (0) →

Napa’s New Calistoga AVA Already Showing Promise

Calistog-ava-pending_lg It hasn’t been all that long since Napa Valley’s hot and northern Calistoga area was awarded with its own AVA designation (for more on American Viticultural Areas, check out the Wikipedia article on the same topic). How has Calistoga wine fared since then, now that we’re coming up on some of the first bottlings to use the new AVA designation?

Based on my recent trip to Napa Valley, the answer is “pretty damn well.”

Napa Valley, for the most part, retains its varied soil profiles and gets warmer as you move north (much to the surprise and afternoon chagrin of many a tourist from the midwest and east coast), since the mitigating cooling effects that work their on the southern parts of the Valley have far less influence in the more northernly winegrowing areas.  I can personally attest to the 100+ degree F roasting that is possible in the 2PM afternoon sun in Calistoga – not fun for humans, but certainly good for the ripening of Cabernet Sauvignon grapes.

Far more interesting than the hot daytime temperatures in Calistoga (to geeks like me, anyway) is the relative uniformity of the soil types found there – unlike the rest of the valley, the Calistoga soil is almost totally derived from volcanic types, and instead expresses its differences in more-or-less rocky profiles (more rocky on the hillsides, more gravelly on the alluvial fans, and more silty in the central areas).  That’s not typical for Napa Valley, where you’re more likely to encounter anywhere from five to well over twenty different soil types within the same AVA.

The (relative) lack of soil differentiation hasn’t detracted from the Cabs one bit, which at their best tend to be less rounded in the palate than their southern Napa counterparts, and more focused in their black-fruit profiles.  They don’t jump out at you, but after a few minutes in the glass they seduce the hell out of you.  In a few cases, I was blown away by the quality of some of the wines that will be moving to the new Calistoga AVA on their labels – so don’t freak out when you start to encounter these beauties on the shelf, just because you aren’t yet familiar with the AVA on the label; you just might miss out on something stellar if you do!

Cheers!

Joe Roberts is a Certified Specialist of Wine and author of the award-winning 1WineDude.com wine blog.

Posted in: Blog

Leave a Comment (0) →
Page 1 of 17 12345...»